• Am I The A’hole? (AITA)
  • AITA for not attending Christmas this year?

    AITA for not attending Christmas this year?
    My wife (29F) and myself (28M) have decided we’re not going anywhere or hosting for Christmas this year – as our baby will be less than a week old on Christmas. Too many people, germs, and chaos for a baby that small. We’ve mentioned this before, but haven’t said much about it because we thought it would be common sense that we wouldn’t be doing anything for the holidays.
    Enter my Mom…”Betty” we’ll call her. I casually mentioned it again few days ago, and she got all mad about it. She says that we’re denying her the chance to see her first grandchild’s first Christmas just because we’re “helicopter parents”. Betty is now refusing to go to any other holiday celebrations within the family because we’re not coming.
    AITA for not attending Christmas this year?

    Skipped Christmas With a Newborn—Now My Mom Is Furious

    A new father is facing family backlash after refusing to attend Christmas celebrations with a newborn baby just days old.

    A new dad chose to keep Christmas quiet with a week-old baby—and his mother says he ruined her first grandparent holiday.

    The Backstory and Early Dynamics

    The couple—both in their late 20s—are expecting their first child just days before Christmas. With a newborn arriving less than a week before the holiday, they decided on a simple plan: no travel, no hosting, no big gatherings.

    Their reasoning was straightforward. Newborns have fragile immune systems. Holiday gatherings mean crowds, noise, and germs. To them, staying home felt like common sense, not a controversial choice.

    They had mentioned this plan casually before, assuming everyone understood.

    The Moment Things Shifted

    A few days ago, the husband brought it up again in conversation with his mom, “Betty.” That’s when everything exploded.

    Betty accused the couple of being “helicopter parents” and claimed they were denying her the chance to see her first grandchild’s first Christmas. What the couple saw as a health-based decision, Betty saw as a personal rejection.

    The Final Confrontation

    Instead of trying to compromise or wait a few weeks, Betty escalated. She announced she would refuse to attend any other family holiday events because her son and daughter-in-law weren’t coming to Christmas.

    The message was clear: if she doesn’t get what she wants, no one does.

    The Fallout

    Now the new parents are left juggling postpartum recovery, newborn care, and emotional pressure from family—on what’s supposed to be one of the most overwhelming weeks of their lives.

    The husband is wondering if standing firm makes him selfish… or simply responsible.

    What Reddit Thinks

    Overall verdict: NTA (Not the Ahole)**

    Most Redditors would likely side with the parents, especially given the baby’s age.

    Sample responses:

    • “A baby less than a week old shouldn’t be passed around like a fruitcake. Your mom is being dramatic.”
    • “First Christmases aren’t for babies—they’re for adults’ feelings. Health comes first.”
    • “She’s punishing the whole family because you won’t risk your newborn? That’s emotional manipulation.”

    A few might suggest offering a short visit later—but very few would call the parents wrong.

    A Final Thought

    When does protecting your child cross the line into “hurting family,” and who really gets to define that boundary?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    3 mins

    Share this content